Rob Bryanton is Gene Ray minus the mouth foam.

Marketing is everything. Whereas Gene Ray and his TIME CUBE theory has been heavily ridiculed since the early days of the web, Rob Bryanton’s 10 dimension story is actually selling books and seeding hippy pseudoscience cults.

I always considered string theory to be too above my head for me even to fathom it, so I always avoided exploring it – I was saving it for later when I was old and had time to learn tensor calculus and stuff. When someone told me there was a video that makes sense of 10 dimensions and string theory in an easy to understand manner, I was all over it. I have to admit that I got suckered in by Bryanton’s slick animations and smooth narration. There was a moment where I was getting excited because I thought that mainstream physics condoned the notion of time travel and alternate realities. “Woah, I totally understand string theory,” I thought to myself. Then I did a cursory wikipedia search of string theory and 10 dimensions. At that point I realized that Bryanton’s imagination has nothing to do with reality or any educated theory whatsoever and that I was a sucker for believing him.

Normally I wouldn’t be angry – Bryanton’s 10 dimensions is a cool sci-fi concept that unifies time travel, alternate realities and alternate universes. But when you consider that he’s literally selling his imaginary world as truth to eager believers who don’t know any better, then this man is a unremitting charlatan.

Anyways. My main point: marketing makes all the difference. First we’ll have Rob Bryanton’s nice, polished bullshit:

10 DIMENSIONS

See. That was nice. Sort of cool. I’d buy that for a dollar if I didn’t know any better. And people are paying many dollars to buy his books.

Now Gene Ray’s Time Cube as a reference:

TIME CUBE

When you’re selling hot air it’s all in the technique.

Be Sociable, Share!
  • http://www.facebook.com/rob.bryanton Rob Bryanton

    What nonsense to compare Gene Ray’s Time Cube to Imagining the Tenth Dimension! No connection whatsoever, and that’s completely obvious just by watching the two videos you’ve provided. Try watching the 2012 version of Imagining the Tenth Dimension, it explains the connections to other theories in more detail, and what I’m trying to achieve with this project.  http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=zqeqW3g8N2Q
    - Rob Bryanton

    • m15r

      Yeah, you’re a complete charlatan and your videos are trash. Maybe you can use your “creative” interpretation of string theory to imagine up some better reviews from skeptics.

  • Marco Erra

    So, it seems that all my myths are being destroyed one by one. First professor Michio Kaku, now Rob Bryanton and even Stephen Hawking. Apparently the commercial side of the quantum mechanics is either inaccurate or too semplicistic. So, how can a person, who cannot invest the required amount of time on such a vast field, get an accurate idea of what quantum mechanics, string theory and such actually are?

    • Lookin ForaLoan

      But Marco, the video is cool.  Cool matters.  Cool sells. Cool captivates. Cool captures the imagination.  Science, even accurate science, doesn’t.  Especially when its presented with unfamiliar nomenclature, greek symbols, and filled with equations.  Its too obtuse.  

      So, Bryanton has made a cool “model”  and like most models, it really has little to do with reality.I will paraphrase Stephen Hawking. “I was told by my publisher. if I put more than one equation, E=mc^2, in my book, ‘A Brief History of Time’, I will cut my readership in half” – Hawking.Millions of people can on some level get something out of this crap.  Almost nobody who hasn’t studied physics and mathematics can truly get much of anything out of quantum mechanical formulas, theorems, and objects, e.g. Δx *Δ(mv) > h/4π.

  • Kevin O.

    I dont get it. What makes this nobody, “Bionic Groin”, a better source of truth? You all become so pompous and arrogant and align with this new perception despite there being no real explanation as to how said perception was made. That is incredibly ironic. I have little faith in any man’s personal theory concerning something so complex, but i have less faith in this blog. I find it hard to believe that Bryanton is a charlatan who is simply out for money. Its absurd to think that any man who thought/researched so deeply about something did so with the intention of making it a scheme.

  • kissinger

    thats very cool. but what about 15 or 25 dimensions?

  • grillerb

    this guy is completely wrong. so wrong and so funny! he has NO IDEA about what string theory is or how it works. I haven’t laughed this long in a while. thanks for this.